Brad Zarse
|
|
« on: June 20, 2008, 06:58:15 pm » |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
nickliv
Guest
|
|
« Reply #1 on: June 20, 2008, 07:59:42 pm » |
|
Chicken can be used, usually by gay men referring to other gay men, to mean a young gay man or young appearing gay man. Stereotypically describing a gay man barely out of adolescence who does not show much of any body hair or well-defined muscle-development. Most would consider a young man of barely-legal age or appearing to be very young and having an innocent nature.[1]
Author Bruce Rodgers defines the term as "1. any boy under the age of consent, heterosexual, fair of face, and unfamiliar with homosexuality ("So many chickens were flapping around that I thought we were touring Colonel Sanders' plantation”) 2. juvenile, youthful, young-looking.[2] Others have defined it as a young man who engages in sex for money or favors.[3]
Recently, some conservative Americans began defining the term itself as gay pedophile related.[4] In the subculture of the gay community which uses handkerchiefs or bandannas as a code, people who identify as "Chicken" wear a Kewpie doll in their left back pocket. Those who are interested in young men - referred to as chickenhawks - are denoted in the hanky code as wearing one on the right.[5]
The term has existed in the gay vernacular for many decades, and is still used today. David Henry Sterry, a former prostitute turned actor and director, titled his 2005 memoir, Chicken: Self-Portrait of a Young Man for Rent.[6] Author Philip Herbst traces its origin to the 19th century, where it was used to describe the youngest sailors on a ship, who were often used for sexual purposes. [7]
Not that I'll bet.
I bet it's the first thought in Rex's filthy head though.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Perdu
|
|
« Reply #2 on: June 20, 2008, 09:39:37 pm » |
|
Kerristonapogostick I'm glad I didn't know that and kinda wish I didn't know it now!
|
|
|
Logged
|
"Ha ha you can't a fool me, there ain't a no sanity clause!"
|
|
|
nopanic - neil
|
|
« Reply #3 on: June 20, 2008, 11:03:13 pm » |
|
Nickliv
You have moved to Scotland, its quiet up there and you must have time on you hands?
Your knowledge is amazing, surpising and shocking!
But thats life
p.s - keep it up as it makes me smile
|
|
|
Logged
|
If you're going through hell, keep going.
|
|
|
Leftie
|
|
« Reply #4 on: June 20, 2008, 11:16:04 pm » |
|
Nickliv
You have moved to Scotland, its quiet up there and you must have time on you hands?
Your knowledge is amazing, surpising and shocking!
But thats life
p.s - keep it up as it makes me smile
Neil,
Nickliv has loads of time on his hands to undertake extensive research while the oil lamps are still fluttering. Agee with Neil here Nick, keep it up. Puts the rest of us to shame.
|
|
« Last Edit: June 20, 2008, 11:19:40 pm by Leftie »
|
Logged
|
At my age, it takes me all night to do what I used to do all night!!!!!!!!!!! Then, growing old is compulsary, but growing up is just optional.
I don't do GREEN, I've got a 4x4
|
|
|
nickliv
Guest
|
|
« Reply #5 on: June 20, 2008, 11:28:32 pm » |
|
Blimey guys, I stoled that orf of wikipedia.
I must confess, I only became aware of the term in my (Younger) youth, I was rather relentlessly pursued by a gentleman of the botting persuasion.
Green as I was, being unfamiliar with the term at the time, I did have a decent idea of what he wanted to do with / to me, and as such his pursuits were always fruitless. Thankfully.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Lord Pig-Pen
|
|
« Reply #6 on: June 21, 2008, 04:36:41 am » |
|
Chicken can be used, usually by gay men referring to other gay men, to mean a young gay man or young appearing gay man. Stereotypically describing a gay man barely out of adolescence who does not show much of any body hair or well-defined muscle-development. Most would consider a young man of barely-legal age or appearing to be very young and having an innocent nature.[1]
Author Bruce Rodgers defines the term as "1. any boy under the age of consent, heterosexual, fair of face, and unfamiliar with homosexuality ("So many chickens were flapping around that I thought we were touring Colonel Sanders' plantation”) 2. juvenile, youthful, young-looking.[2] Others have defined it as a young man who engages in sex for money or favors.[3]
Recently, some conservative Americans began defining the term itself as gay pedophile related.[4] In the subculture of the gay community which uses handkerchiefs or bandannas as a code, people who identify as "Chicken" wear a Kewpie doll in their left back pocket. Those who are interested in young men - referred to as chickenhawks - are denoted in the hanky code as wearing one on the right.[5]
The term has existed in the gay vernacular for many decades, and is still used today. David Henry Sterry, a former prostitute turned actor and director, titled his 2005 memoir, Chicken: Self-Portrait of a Young Man for Rent.[6] Author Philip Herbst traces its origin to the 19th century, where it was used to describe the youngest sailors on a ship, who were often used for sexual purposes. [7]
Not that I'll bet.
I bet it's the first thought in Rex's filthy head though.
Nick, Having read through your obviously well researched or known details of the Botter or Bottee I find it somewhat disturbing that you mention me as a foot note. Keeping poultry and having an interest in amateur pyrotechnics does not put me into the category of rampant active shirt lifter! What ferry are you on next year sweet cheeks?
|
|
|
Logged
|
What do you mean dust?.... Thats not dust, this is dust! Ich Habe Honda S2000 and its not mine!
|
|
|
Martini...LB
|
|
« Reply #7 on: June 21, 2008, 02:16:52 pm » |
|
So a free range chicken is a bit of a slapper then?
Anyone seen my hat?
>Martini...
|
|
|
Logged
|
l'abus d'alcool est dangereux pour la santé , à consommer avec modération
|
|
|
nickliv
Guest
|
|
« Reply #8 on: June 21, 2008, 08:16:20 pm » |
|
Chicken can be used, usually by gay men referring to other gay men, to mean a young gay man or young appearing gay man. Stereotypically describing a gay man barely out of adolescence who does not show much of any body hair or well-defined muscle-development. Most would consider a young man of barely-legal age or appearing to be very young and having an innocent nature.[1]
Author Bruce Rodgers defines the term as "1. any boy under the age of consent, heterosexual, fair of face, and unfamiliar with homosexuality ("So many chickens were flapping around that I thought we were touring Colonel Sanders' plantation”) 2. juvenile, youthful, young-looking.[2] Others have defined it as a young man who engages in sex for money or favors.[3]
Recently, some conservative Americans began defining the term itself as gay pedophile related.[4] In the subculture of the gay community which uses handkerchiefs or bandannas as a code, people who identify as "Chicken" wear a Kewpie doll in their left back pocket. Those who are interested in young men - referred to as chickenhawks - are denoted in the hanky code as wearing one on the right.[5]
The term has existed in the gay vernacular for many decades, and is still used today. David Henry Sterry, a former prostitute turned actor and director, titled his 2005 memoir, Chicken: Self-Portrait of a Young Man for Rent.[6] Author Philip Herbst traces its origin to the 19th century, where it was used to describe the youngest sailors on a ship, who were often used for sexual purposes. [7]
Not that I'll bet.
I bet it's the first thought in Rex's filthy head though.
Nick, Having read through your obviously well researched or known details of the Botter or Bottee I find it somewhat disturbing that you mention me as a foot note. Keeping poultry and having an interest in amateur pyrotechnics does not put me into the category of rampant active shirt lifter! What ferry are you on next year sweet cheeks? Tut Tut Rex. I thought you ran a perversion parllour, and as such assumed you to hold at least a theoretical grasp of the term
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
lady pig-pen
|
|
« Reply #9 on: June 21, 2008, 08:34:17 pm » |
|
this is when they were sleepy babbie chicks....
|
|
|
Logged
|
stay ginger xxx
|
|
|
lady pig-pen
|
|
« Reply #10 on: June 21, 2008, 08:35:36 pm » |
|
i cant make the picture work
|
|
|
Logged
|
stay ginger xxx
|
|
|
nopanic - neil
|
|
« Reply #11 on: June 21, 2008, 09:13:04 pm » |
|
i cant make the picture work Luv the avater and also younger than Kev_Mk3, also you can get on at any time. Kev's not allowed to do it at work anymore.
|
|
|
Logged
|
If you're going through hell, keep going.
|
|
|
Lord Pig-Pen
|
|
« Reply #12 on: June 21, 2008, 09:39:32 pm » |
|
I appear to have a new avatar.... isn't Lady PP clever!!
|
|
|
Logged
|
What do you mean dust?.... Thats not dust, this is dust! Ich Habe Honda S2000 and its not mine!
|
|
|
lady pig-pen
|
|
« Reply #13 on: June 22, 2008, 02:02:14 am » |
|
not quite sure how to get the sizing right but...... how sweet are they...the yellow one is Enid and the one of darker colouring is Vince.....
|
|
|
Logged
|
stay ginger xxx
|
|
|
Lord Pig-Pen
|
|
« Reply #14 on: June 22, 2008, 02:53:41 am » |
|
She appears to be getting too good at this.... I think an upskirt pic is needed Perdu.... you took about 800 while we walked back
|
|
|
Logged
|
What do you mean dust?.... Thats not dust, this is dust! Ich Habe Honda S2000 and its not mine!
|
|
|
|