|
gab
|
 |
« Reply #30 on: August 09, 2006, 01:05:19 pm » |
|
...yep same motor as me...meant 2.4 and not 2.5 litre. If it`s not tuned or some type of import that was not meant for the UK market then maybe you were just going down a very long and steep hill Rick  Sure can`t get that performance out of a pre-1994/95 T4 even one meant for the German market. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
neilsie
CA Veteran
Sr. Member
 Offline
Posts: 312
KK
|
|
« Reply #31 on: August 09, 2006, 03:35:10 pm » |
|
Also, where is this supposed two mile runway? Even the JCB diesel land speed car is currently practicing at RAF Wittering which has a 1.6 mile of blacktop. I was led to believe this was the longest in the UK, so where has a two mile straight?
Not sure but Greenham Common used to have over 2 miles of runway. How long is the runway at Marham? RAF Upper Heyford was around 2 miles long i think. They had F111's. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
LangTall
|
|
« Reply #32 on: August 09, 2006, 03:43:13 pm » |
|
I just can't understand how a 78bhp van can cruise at 115mph and yet apparently be geared with the same final drive ratio as the Ultimate TT above and therefore have a theoretical top speed of 210mph! As you know, I am possessed of a 48bhp van which struggles to get to 65mph even when empty and runs on shorter gearing, giving a terminal velocity of 75mph at the end of the red line. I know weight and wind resistance comes into it took, as does your greater torque, but does your extra 30bhp really equal a very comfortable 50mph higher top speed?
Could be something to do with the onboard balast penalty that has been served on the Commer Ian the answer is above  Is it? I'd question that. I did a quick check on the VW website and the and the current VW Transporter with the 130bhp TDI engine (which obviously has nearly double the bhp and torque than Rick's normally aspirated version) is credited with a top speed (where the law permits) of 104mph. Whilst I agree, Peter, that Rick's VW has a much torquier mill than the Commer, it does not explain the apparent cruising speed of 115mph. A high-top van all kitted out with heavy camper gear (i.e. beds, fridge, gas and water tanks, cooker, exterior awning and all the other parlava) and with just 78bhp, can someone please explain how it can go faster by a margin of 11mph higher than the new VW which has much higher bhp and torque, lighter weight and better areodynamics? Maybe the answer is blindingly simple, I suggest that Rick's van is a foreign import and he's forgotten to change the speedo from kph to mph! It's either that or he's giving us a slightly ambitious account of the performance capabilities of his van, which incidentally is a very well appointed camper indeed. That thought also crossed my mind. Paddy has a T5 TDI, and manages 170 km/h with it. calculate that to Mph, and you've got 105 Mph. 115 kmh = 71 Mph. 115 Mph = 185 kmh. Can't believe you manage that with a T4 without TDI engine. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
 This film should be played at high volume, so don't come complaining about it! And who the hell is Steve? |
|
|
|
Ferrari Spider
Guest
|
|
« Reply #33 on: August 09, 2006, 04:37:50 pm » |
|
I just can't understand how a 78bhp van can cruise at 115mph and yet apparently be geared with the same final drive ratio as the Ultimate TT above and therefore have a theoretical top speed of 210mph! As you know, I am possessed of a 48bhp van which struggles to get to 65mph even when empty and runs on shorter gearing, giving a terminal velocity of 75mph at the end of the red line. I know weight and wind resistance comes into it took, as does your greater torque, but does your extra 30bhp really equal a very comfortable 50mph higher top speed?
Could be something to do with the onboard balast penalty that has been served on the Commer Ian the answer is above Is it? I'd question that. I did a quick check on the VW website and the and the current VW Transporter with the 130bhp TDI engine (which obviously has nearly double the bhp and torque than Rick's normally aspirated version) is credited with a top speed (where the law permits) of 104mph. Whilst I agree, Peter, that Rick's VW has a much torquier mill than the Commer, it does not explain the apparent cruising speed of 115mph. A high-top van all kitted out with heavy camper gear (i.e. beds, fridge, gas and water tanks, cooker, exterior awning and all the other parlava) and with just 78bhp, can someone please explain how it can go faster by a margin of 11mph higher than the new VW which has much higher bhp and torque, lighter weight and better areodynamics? Maybe the answer is blindingly simple, I suggest that Rick's van is a foreign import and he's forgotten to change the speedo from kph to mph! It's either that or he's giving us a slightly ambitious account of the performance capabilities of his van, which incidentally is a very well appointed camper indeed. That thought also crossed my mind. Paddy has a T5 TDI, and manages 170 km/h with it. calculate that to Mph, and you've got 105 Mph. 115 kmh = 71 Mph. 115 Mph = 185 kmh. Can't believe you manage that with a T4 without TDI engine. are you saying that un-truths and misleading facts are being reported on this forum, my flabers are gasted if that it is true, i thought it was truth and nothing but truth on here. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Martini...LB
|
|
« Reply #35 on: August 09, 2006, 10:12:28 pm » |
|
Something you feel you have to listen to...!!!??? >Martini... |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
l'abus d'alcool est dangereux pour la santé , à consommer avec modération
|
|
|
|
Steve Pyro
|
|
« Reply #36 on: August 09, 2006, 11:27:29 pm » |
|
When I built my cobra, I needed to have the speedo correctly calibrated. I'd heartily recommend Speedy Cables for recalibrating and correcting inaccurate speedos. More info here - http://www.speedycables.com/calibration.htm |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Steve  East Anglian cobras 
|
|
|
|
Rusty
|
|
« Reply #37 on: August 10, 2006, 12:05:51 am » |
|
I agree Steve.
|
The Brethren Rock
|
|
|
|
Rusty
|
|
« Reply #38 on: August 10, 2006, 12:19:34 am » |
|
As far as vans are concerned, all our Hertz rentas have been a gas with the Veedub being the quickest. But they are totally gay compared to this mother.
Don't be a shirt, get a rocket up your arse.
|
The Brethren Rock
|
|
|
|
Snoring Rhino
|
|
« Reply #39 on: August 10, 2006, 10:54:51 am » |
|
I just can't understand how a 78bhp van can cruise at 115mph and yet apparently be geared with the same final drive ratio as the Ultimate TT above and therefore have a theoretical top speed of 210mph! As you know, I am possessed of a 48bhp van which struggles to get to 65mph even when empty and runs on shorter gearing, giving a terminal velocity of 75mph at the end of the red line. I know weight and wind resistance comes into it took, as does your greater torque, but does your extra 30bhp really equal a very comfortable 50mph higher top speed?
Could be something to do with the onboard balast penalty that has been served on the Commer Ian the answer is above Is it? I dont see any mention of the fat gits being carried. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Andy Zarse
|
|
« Reply #40 on: August 10, 2006, 12:30:19 pm » |
|
Rick's driven some fantastic vehicles over the years. I remember him telling me and Gibberish once about a 1.4 litre Peugeot 306 he'd driven the day before, I can't remember all the details because we'd been drinking Harvey's Bitter, but it was extrememly impressive. I think the vehicle managed to do 110mph in third gear which, once the gearing was back-calculated, equated to about 12,000rpm. Rather like Nordic's A Team flying car, how and why the SOHC engine did not detonate was never adequately explained, but i remember me and Gib were mightily impressed. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
I wouldn't sit there if I were you, it's still a bit wet.
|
|
|
|
rcutler
Guest
|
|
« Reply #41 on: August 10, 2006, 01:29:38 pm » |
|
Nope it was a company car that was the 2.0l 16v XSI
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
vqdave
|
|
« Reply #42 on: August 10, 2006, 02:12:01 pm » |
|
i think you will find hire cars are faster than company cars.............my mind goes back to getting pulled for speeding on my honeymoon at the Grand Canyon in my hired Ford Excursion thingy. Now you would think that a big boat like that would be dog slow, but i think the gearing was something special like a 2 speed auto and i was pulling a heady 50 mph round a corner in a national park. Pulled into a viewing spot, was told to sit on my hands on the bumper while a coach full of japanese took my picture as i was repremanded with one of teh natural wonders over my shoulder. I think at a different point of the holiday, in a different state i hasten to add, i got the beast up to around the low 70's!!!!!! And yes that is MPH not KPH my speed loving buddies  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
