|
smokie
|
 |
« Reply #75 on: December 09, 2003, 02:01:06 pm » |
|
...cleavage in that it could support a mobile phone (which if course we had to test several times...
...in line with current legislation - hands free, I trust |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Andy Zarse
|
|
« Reply #76 on: December 09, 2003, 02:41:35 pm » |
|
[attachment deleted by admin - age > 25 days]
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
I wouldn't sit there if I were you, it's still a bit wet.
|
|
|
|
gibberish
|
|
« Reply #77 on: December 09, 2003, 04:06:01 pm » |
|
Gibberish,
Whilst I respect and acknowledge your professional standing in the field of International Vomit Studies, I would comment as follows:
(deleted to save space)
With due respect, can I suggest you reinvestigate the presence or otherwise of the van to determine a conclusion with regard to the propounded existence of the sick.
Just like the Cat(sick) in a Box(van) theory.
I await your further comment.
(PS The van may say Bedford on the front, but these were made by Commer for Bedford.)
My dear Zarse Thank you for that kind acknowlegement. It all started in junior school when I used to volunteer for sick patrol, but that's another story. I am, however, slightly miffed at your comments regarding my observational powers. The van to which you refer has been there for years, and operartes as a mobile burger stall at the weekends when it can be seen to be surrounded by lots of pimple faced oicks at 1.00 in the morning, trying to get home from some night club or other. It is to be regretted that my feeble knowledge of the illustrious Commer did not extend to understanding the relationship with Bedford. As you say, Neitchian Logical Positivism would therefore tend to show that the sick was in fact there, and I unreservedly withdraw any aspertions that might have been directed at your mental abilities. I would, upon reflection, tend toward the theory that whatever remained was lapped up by some depraved local. Should you have any further need for analysis of, or investigation into, strange puddles of sick, I shall remain at your disposal. Yours in pukedom Gibberish (Doctor of puke studies) |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Reality is an illusion caused by alchohol deficiency!
|
|
|
|
Andy Zarse
|
|
« Reply #78 on: December 09, 2003, 05:25:27 pm » |
|
Dear Professor Gibberish,
In view of your comments, I am prepared to accept your revised findings in all good faith.
Incidentally, I forwarded your paper to a Greek colleague, Dr Sikalopolopolis of the Athens Institute for Bile and Acid Reflux Disease and who has reminded me that:
There was an old man of Corfu,
Who fed upon ***t juice and spew.
When he couldn't get this
He fed upon p**s
And a bloody good substitute, too.
My colleague continues:
Coprophagous individuals are not unknown in this area of Sussex. A horrid baquet, yet such perversions do occur. In my paper entitled Pathology of the Mind (p.358), I write that the "smell and taste of of recycled chips and Bacardi Breezers are extremely vitiated, also hair, filth, live frogs, cockroaches, worms and other disgusting matters being swallowed with gusto". The practice is not common amongst the peoples of Horley; not yet at all events."
I think it is time to close this subject within at least hailing distance of a taste barrier.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
I wouldn't sit there if I were you, it's still a bit wet.
|
|
|
|
gibberish
|
|
« Reply #79 on: December 09, 2003, 05:40:38 pm » |
|
I think it is time to close this subject within at least hailing distance of a taste barrier.
I bow to your suggestion..................no more puking, well at least on this thread  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Reality is an illusion caused by alchohol deficiency!
|
|
|
|
smokie
|
|
« Reply #80 on: December 09, 2003, 06:18:29 pm » |
|
Yeah, ever so slightly OT too if I may add...  So, let the discussion on the victory parade continue!!! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Steve Pyro
|
|
« Reply #81 on: December 09, 2003, 07:12:55 pm » |
|
Steve, hope your wife enjoyed our company, it can't be much fun to meet us pissheads after a hard day's slog at the office.
Yes, most definately  Without her 'guidance' I'm sure I wouldn't have been back home even now. I vaguely remember us both walking back to Oxford Circus tube to find the station closed. So we set off towards Tottenham Court Road. En route, the call of nature got too much and I had to dash into McDonalds facilities. When I staggered back out onto Oxford Street, I couldn't see her anywhere. So I continued on up the road, only to bump into her near the next station. I needed a tube ticket, but I'm sure the guy behind the ticket window thought I was speaking swahili. Any road up, we got back to Dagenham and, a real bonus, the car was still where I remember leaving it. So, off up the A12, with a short interuption at a layby for another slash. I thanked my wife for meeting me and driving me home after the pub this morning. Her loving reply was "Steve, you were pissed as a rat". Ho hum.  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Steve  East Anglian cobras 
|
|
|
|
Matt Harper
|
|
« Reply #82 on: December 09, 2003, 08:03:37 pm » |
|
Enough is enough! For pity's sake, can't something be done to curtail the vile and incidious postings of A Zarse esq.
Common decency and good taste must prevail.
I call upon the powers that be to restrain this unholy renegade.
I propose that a cease and desist order be served upon the blaggard, preventing him from posting any more pictures of knackered old vans, mini-buses, motorhomes and totally decrepit and f**ked-up commercial vehicles on this website.
His dabbling and paddling with the stomach contents of others is both creative and entertaining.
His malevolent images of 60's rot-boxes are tiresome in the extreme. Have a care, man! Allow those bastard spawn of Rootes Group to sink back into the primordial ooze, from which they crawled.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
If it\'s good and fast, it won\'t be cheap. If it\'s fast and cheap, it won\'t be good. If it\'s good and cheap, it won\'t be fast.
|
|
|
|
|
|
gibberish
|
|
« Reply #84 on: December 10, 2003, 09:49:31 am » |
|
Excellent post Matt but WRONG WRONG WRONG |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Reality is an illusion caused by alchohol deficiency!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Andy Zarse
|
|
« Reply #86 on: December 10, 2003, 11:48:25 am » |
|
Yeah, ever so slightly OT too if I may add... So, let the discussion on the victory parade continue!!! Just to clarify the structure of the limerick, ****t juice is of course fruit juice. I know the beer drinkers are sometimes offended by this foul language, hence the ****. There is an alternative ending to the limerick too. If I post it here, it may cause more mild offence. Anyone fancy a poll to see if it should be posted? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
I wouldn't sit there if I were you, it's still a bit wet.
|
|
|
|
Andy Zarse
|
|
« Reply #87 on: December 10, 2003, 12:11:31 pm » |
|
En route, the call of nature got too much and I had to dash into McDonalds facilities.
Steve, in case you didn't know, the habit of going into a McDonalds for a slash and not buying any food is called "going for a McPiss". |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: December 10, 2003, 12:12:40 pm by Andy Zarse »
|
Logged
|
I wouldn't sit there if I were you, it's still a bit wet.
|
|
|
|
smokie
|
|
« Reply #88 on: December 10, 2003, 12:31:41 pm » |
|
Just to clarify the structure of the limerick, ****t juice is of course fruit juice. I know the beer drinkers are sometimes offended by this foul language, hence the ****. There is an alternative ending to the limerick too. If I post it here, it may cause more mild offence. Anyone fancy a poll to see if it should be posted? Thanks for the clarification Andy, I was wondering what it meant...  If the alternative ending is likely to cause mild offence even to hardened CA visitors then it's probably best left till you can tell us all in the flesh, next June! Please! |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: December 10, 2003, 12:32:36 pm by smokie »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Matt Harper
|
|
« Reply #89 on: December 10, 2003, 05:29:32 pm » |
|
Excellent post Matt but WRONG WRONG WRONG Why, why, why Gib? Go on, thrill me with your acumen? (I'm on a bit of a movie quote trip, at present) |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
If it\'s good and fast, it won\'t be cheap. If it\'s fast and cheap, it won\'t be good. If it\'s good and cheap, it won\'t be fast.
|
|
|
|
